Projected FY2026 expense
The City’s projection for direct Apponaug Rink operating costs.
The Greenwood Credit Union City Hall Plaza was presented as a year-round destination whose revenue would offset its operating costs. Warwick’s own next budget projects $150,000 in first-year revenue against $635,503 in expenses. Is the mayor’s signature project performing?
The strongest case for scrutiny does not require rumors. It is printed in the City of Warwick’s proposed FY2027 budget.
The City’s projection for direct Apponaug Rink operating costs.
The City’s revised estimate after initially budgeting far more.
The difference between those two published figures.
The approved FY2026 budget said rink revenue would flow to the general fund and offset more than $700,000 in annual costs. The later budget projects just $150,000.
Residents deserve the attendance forecast, pricing assumptions, sponsorship schedule, concession estimates, rental assumptions, and comparable-facility analysis behind the original number.
See the questionsThe approved budget listed $723,546 in direct expenses and matching revenue. A later comparison shows adopted revenue as $798,546—$75,000 higher.
The next budget reports revenue through March 31 and projects only $150,000 for the fiscal year.
Projected direct expenses of $635,503 minus projected revenue of $150,000.
After the projected miss, the next budget assumes precise break-even. Show the public the basis.
How much came from skating, bumper cars, concessions, rentals, events, sponsorships, and naming rights?
Which costs are recorded directly to the rink, and which are absorbed elsewhere?
What documents and assumptions supported the revenue estimate?
What changed to justify exact break-even in FY2027?